This one-day workshop positions Eastern and Central Europe as a critical field for global modern knowledge by looking at the betweenness of East Central European intellectuals and their contributions to the history of social science in the twentieth century. Betweenness is here understood in both regional termsthat is, East Central Europes historic position as a culturally and developmentally ambiguous periphery of the Westand biographical ones, including experiences of exile, dislocation, and/or statelessness. As an analytic category, betweenness forges transnational histories among regions and countries (such as Israel or India) that based their global position and intellectual production on their liminality.
Such an approach re-illuminates the history of twentieth-century social science in important ways, reflecting James Cliffords reminder that these disciplines were always part of the very processes of innovation and structuration they hoped to investigate. On the one hand, it highlights the seminal role of colonial subjects and stateless exiles like Malinowski and Znaniecki in generating early and influentialalbeit highly contesteddisciplinary models, suggesting that key narratives of social science history may be best understood from the margins. On the other, it illuminates how East Central and South Eastern Europeans have used their position between West and East, civilized and savage, and first and third world to mediate global regimes of knowledge.